Saturday, November 28, 2020

25% off on all these books ....

 


Please avail of the 25% off feature on these books. 

1. We can Lead, available here

https://notionpress.com/read/we-can-lead

2. The Scrum Master Guidebook, available here

https://notionpress.com/read/the-scrum-master-guidebook

3. The Agilst's Guidebook, available here

https://www.zorbabooks.com/store/technical/the-agilists-guidebook-a-reference-for-agile-transformation/


Please know more about these books before you decide to buy...

here

https://pataryguidebooks.blogspot.com/

#agiletransformation #agilecoach #scrummasters #scrummaster #agilecoaching #agileprojectmanagement #scrumteam #changeagents #leadershipdevelopment #leadershipcoaching


Friday, November 27, 2020

Social Loafing: Killer traits for a High-Performance team



I am certain all of us have come across such challenges in a team context, named Social Loafing.

Social loafing is the phenomenon of an individual exerting less effort to accomplish a goal when they function in a group than when working alone.

I am sure during your coaching engagement you might have come across such a condition.
In 1913, Max Ringelmann, a French agricultural engineer, conducted what many believe was the first recorded social psychology experiment.

He carefully measured how much force people exerted when they pulled a rope alone, and when they pulled it with up to thirteen additional people.

He conducted additional studies in the lab and in the field and summarized all these results together.

His results were mind-boggling.

Applying his findings back to the rope experiment, Ringelmann found that when a person was added to the rope, everyone pulled with less strength.

When two people were on the line, they each pulled with 93 percent of the force of a person working alone.

Three people each pulled with 85 percent of the force, and so on.

By the time eight people joined the rope, they were each pulling with half the force of a single person.

As a result, a team of eight pulled the rope with no more total force than a team of seven.

In a set of simple rope pulling experiments he discovered that, in what is now known as the Ringelmann Effect, people’s efforts quickly diminish as team size increases.

According to Ringelmann (1913), groups fail to reach their full potential because various interpersonal processes detract from the group’s overall proficiency.

Namely, two distinct processes have been identified as potential sources for the reduced productivity of groups: loss of motivation and coordination problems.

How do we come out from this Social loafing problem?

Let us concentrate on a few issues.

The Sucker Effect: When individuals start to feel that others are slacking off, they try not to get stuck “holding the bag” themselves. In the attempt to escape becoming the “sucker,” overall group output goes down. What do we do about this issue?

Let us connect with all the individuals and try to understand why they are slacking? this could be a personality issue, skill issue, communication barriers, etc challenges.

As a coach, we need to single out such individuals and fix such issues.

Missing accountability, Every team member has to hold each other accountable. Once they recognize that they have to contribute, they will less likely miss their own accountability issues. This is generally practiced to explain the bystander effect, or the tendency to be less likely to help a person in need when others are present.

Some time Social loafing happens when the team does not have stretched goals identified for themselves. There should be a clear SMART goal identified for each team member. Every team member should have a clear distinct goal identified for themselves. And at a certain regular interval, we should check how well those goals are happening.

Team size also matters, more team members do not necessarily mean faster work. More team members more social loafing will be noticeable. 

Team agreement, there should be clear team rules and an agreement needs to be written. Team members only write those rules and maintain those. Team members need to modify those rules whenever it is requisite, and they should abide by those rules. An exception could be there, but the majority of the time team should follow those. As a coach, look for these team agreements and guide the team whenever we find the team is not following the written rules.

Peer Review helps most of the time. The team can set the rule of the team agreed that some of their team members will review artifacts produced by other team members and improve those.

Need to enhance Team cohesion. Team cohesion occurs when a group of individuals feels connected and driven to achieve a common goal. They share values, goals, and processes.

One of the best ways to get everyone involved is to make sure that they feel as though the Manager or leader values their contribution. When they believe the benefits they bring to the table are key to the success of the team, they will be more likely to play an active role.

There should be a team performance reward system also there should High performers within the teams should be recognized and rewarded to alleviate this effort.

Monday, November 16, 2020

Head First Or Heart First Individuals?



Why do we desire a harmony of Head First and Heart First Individuals in a high-performance team?

Are you a Head First - Rationally Driven, or Heart First - Emotionally driven Individuals?

How about the same percentage on the team? How effectively these distributions are in place?

Both have their strengths, both have their challenges.

A Head First team member can think more logically and in a circumstance when Emotion takes over those head first individuals can support the emotionally loaded Individual to aid them through logically thinking.
“If I had an hour to solve a problem, I would spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and five minutes about the solution,” Einstein once said.

Heart First Individuals, however, are more prone to produce instant decisions based on their intuition and feel happier with that call in the long run. The Heart First individuals expressed themselves as ‘distressed’ and ‘nervous’ when encountered with frequent stress. To “have a heart” indicates higher degrees of caring and empathy.
"One day we will learn that the heart can never be totally right if the head is totally wrong. Only through the bringing together of head and heart-intelligence and goodness-shall man rise to a fulfillment of his true nature." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

“People who said their ‘self’ was located in their heart (about half the respondents) were more likely to be female, and ‘heart-locators’ of either sex were more likely to rely on their emotions when making hypothetical moral decisions, such as how to respond to a sadistic prison guard who says he will kill your son and another prisoner unless you kill your own son,” explains Dr. Christian Jarrett of the British Psychological Society’s Research Digest.

Head First Individuals placed higher importance on autonomy, and Heart First Individuals valued belonging to social groups.

The Head First Individuals can plunge into analysis paralysis, where they keep weighing facts and collecting ever more intelligence in an endeavor to generate the perfect decision, leading to confusion, anxiety, indecisiveness, and self-criticism, which in turn can impact productivity and performance.

The Heart First Individuals are more creative as they are associated with emotions. They can relate smoothly with others through emotions. Sometimes when emotions are heavily laden, these individuals are slow down by the emotions. That time Head First individuals can protect them!

How to stabilize the same in the team?

I have examined some teams that are frequently dominated by the substantial with heart Individuals and frequently few Head First Individuals will influence the team with their rational analyzing capabilities.

As a whole team, let us watch out and practice to reach an intermediate ground.

If we as a team majority are Head First individual, practice for a week just listening to our Heart first team members; slowing down and asking ourselves how we feel several times a day and then choosing the risk of acting on those feelings. If we are higher of a heart First Individuals, work out for a week tackling that assignment that we don’t feel like working out to build up our willpower and discipline. Show empathy but deliberately set boundaries on how much we can/will support someone who’s battling.

Most of the time before the PI planning, you might have observed which backlog items will go into the PI, though it is logical and rational. But sometimes, these decision making also is driven by intuition, emotions and based on empathy.
" My heart says one thing. My head says another. Very hard to get your heart and head together in life." - Woody Allen

Watch out for such instances and coach the team to balance these traits.

Saturday, November 7, 2020

Best Selling Scrum Master Book

 @07th November 2020, If you google search these words, “Best Selling Scrum Master Books”, you will discover “The Scrum Master Guidebook”, specified!! thanks to all my fellow companions to promote and popularize this book to reach this level. Thanks for all your encouragement! Please keep recommending this book to your associate Agilist’s colleagues...It illustrates this book has many wellwishers….

#scrummasters #scrumteam #scrumteams #scrumtraining #agilecoach #agilecoaching



The Guidebooks